--- description: HeavyBid : avantages et inconvénients. Lisez les avis clients, consultez les prix et découvrez les fonctionnalités. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: HeavyBid - Avis, notes, prix et abonnements - Capterra Canada 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels de devis pour le bâtiment](/directory/30056/construction-estimating/software) > [HeavyBid](/software/34221/heavybid) # HeavyBid Canonical: https://fr.capterra.ca/software/34221/heavybid Page : 1/22\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/34221/heavybid?page=2) > Pour les sous-traitants en infrastructure qui soumissionnent pour des projets allant de 1 000 à plus d'un milliard de dollars. > > Conclusion : 506 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.6/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise HeavyBid? Entreprises d'infrastructure dans les secteurs des transports, des services publics, du pétrole et du gaz, de l'électricité et des bâtiments industriels et commerciaux. ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.6/5** | 506 Avis | | Simplicité | 4.2/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.8/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.2/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos du vendeur - **Entreprise**: HCSS - **Pays**: Sugar Land, É.-U. - **Fondé**: 1986 ## Contexte commercial - **Public cible**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Mac (ordinateur), Windows (ordinateur), Windows (sur site), Linux (sur site), iPhone (mobile), iPad (mobile) - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: Canada, États-Unis ## Fonctionnalités - Analyse hypothétique - Correcteur grammatical - Estimation des coûts - Gestion de projets - Gestion des offres - Gestion des ordres de changement - Gestion des sous-traitants - Modèles personnalisables - Outils de collaboration - Relevé des matériaux - Subcontractor Monitoring - Suivi des coûts - Suivi des projets ## Intégrations (3 au total) - Microsoft Excel - QuickBooks Online - Sage Accounting ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/courriel - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances - Support téléphonique - Support 24/7 (réponse directe) - Chat/Clavardage ## Category - [Logiciels de devis pour le bâtiment](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/30056/construction-estimating/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Logiciels de devis pour le bâtiment](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/30056/construction-estimating/software) - [Logiciels pour projet de construction](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/30960/construction-bid-management/software) - [Logiciels pour sous-traitance](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/32699/subcontractor/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [Contractor Foreman](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/166113/contractor-foreman) — 4.5/5 (820 reviews) 2. [STACK](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/147181/stack-takeoff) — 4.5/5 (1348 reviews) 3. [PlanHub](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/179042/planhub) — 4.3/5 (416 reviews) 4. [RIB Candy](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/126567/candy) — 4.5/5 (241 reviews) 5. [Jobber](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/127994/jobber) — 4.6/5 (1435 reviews) ## Avis ### "The Best Estimating Software on the Market" — 5.0/5 > **Jonathan** | *2 novembre 2018* | Construction | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: - Has a plethora of features which create an easy bidding process - Can setup local or global resource libraries to allow a job-specific library with our general materials - Easy to run all reports of all different kinds and easy to read > > **Inconvénients**: - Can be a bit buggy when within an activity, which may force it to crash. This is primarily because of user error though and you learn ways to stop this from happening. ----- ### "Excellent product for Civil Construction Projects" — 4.0/5 > **Riccardo** | *8 février 2018* | Construction | Taux de recommandation : 7.0/10 > > **Avantages**: It's like a giant spreadsheet and helps you to manage several parts of your project Really great auditing features > > **Inconvénients**: Program is still based on an old and archaic data structure that sometimes requires maintenance Not very good for complex mechanical projects ----- ### "Limited Fields are Biggest Negative" — 4.0/5 > **Utilisateur vérifié** | *2 octobre 2018* | Construction | Taux de recommandation : 7.0/10 > > **Avantages**: It offers lots of options for how to enter bid items. The modules talk to each other well so information does not have to be entered numerous times. > > **Inconvénients**: The character limit in the description field is the most aggravating quality. I enter descriptions that are sometimes three lines long and they don't fit. I have to make up absurd abbreviations because my estimators don't like the Alternate Description feature as they have to toggel between them. > > It's great for most estimating functions and it is super easy to copy files. However, the limited description is such a drawback it would probably preclude me from actully recommedning it to others in my field who would invariably run into the same issue. ----- ### "Moved to Estimating Link" — 4.0/5 > **Nick** | *25 octobre 2024* | Agriculture | Taux de recommandation : 5.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Able to copy over bids for similar projects > > **Inconvénients**: The service after HCSS was sold out went downhill. I had a lot of trouble using HCSS Dispatcher. > > Loved it for the first 20 years that I used it. Like I said, once they get large, the little guy doesn't matter anymore. ----- ### "Only Longtime Users Can Possibly Like HeavyBid" — 2.0/5 > **Jeremy** | *27 novembre 2020* | Construction | Taux de recommandation : 0.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Customer support is good. It has to be because HeavyBid itself is archaic. > > **Inconvénients**: 1. Anything in bulk. Example: Cannot even “non-add” multiple activities. Rather, you must click on one at a time and then click the “non-additive” radio button on each and every activity. Such limitations are in all areas of the software. 2. Sorting and organizing is essentially non-existent. This aspect of HeavyBid is one of the most frustrating things I’ve ever encountered on any software of any kind. This is especially frustrating on bids with child and grandchild bid items requiring reorganization. In resource setup registers, there is no way to sort. Material lists can be quite large and HeavyBid offers no way to sort this data. Unbelievable that this is the case in 2020. API integrations are not even on the table because of the old architecture of HeavyBid. It seems that those giving HeavyBid good reviews have not been exposed to other platforms. HeavyBid is an outdated software that needs to be completed rewritten to stay relevant. I have been a user of the following estimating software platforms TPL, B2W, InEight Estimate, HeavyBid. > > HeavyBid is YEARS (perhaps decades) behind other platforms, especially InEight. HCSS needs to rewrite the entire platform in order to be relevant again. ----- Page : 1/22\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/34221/heavybid?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/34221/heavybid) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Données structurées