--- description: Ideagen EHS : avantages et inconvénients. Lisez les avis clients, consultez les prix et découvrez les fonctionnalités. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Ideagen EHS - Avis, notes, prix et abonnements - Capterra Canada 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels pour audit énergétique](/directory/20018/energy-management/software) > [Ideagen EHS](/software/150019/Ideagen-EHS) # Ideagen EHS Canonical: https://fr.capterra.ca/software/150019/Ideagen-EHS Page : 1/4\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/150019/Ideagen-EHS?page=2) > Conclusion : 67 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.4/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise Ideagen EHS? Marché cible : Amérique du Nord, Amérique du Sud, Amérique latine et Caraïbes, Europe, Moyen-Orient, Asie-Pacifique, Japon et Océanie. Fonctions cibles : QHSE, développement durable, environnement. ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.4/5** | 67 Avis | | Simplicité | 4.3/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.2/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.3/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 80% | (8/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos du vendeur - **Entreprise**: Ideagen - **Entreprise fondée en**: 1993 ## Contexte commercial - **Type de licence**: (Version d’essai gratuite) - **Public cible**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Mac (ordinateur), Windows (ordinateur), Windows (sur site), Chromebook (ordinateur), Android (mobile), iPhone (mobile), iPad (mobile) - **Langues**: allemand, anglais, bulgare, croate, danois, espagnol, estonien, finnois, français, hongrois, indonésien, irlandais, islandais, italien, japonais, malais, néerlandais, polonais, portugais brésilien, roumain, russe, suédois, tchèque, turc, vietnamien - **Pays disponibles**: Australie, Royaume-Uni, États-Unis ## Fonctionnalités - Air Emissions Management - Alertes/Notifications - Archivage et rétention - Carbon Emissions Calculations - Classification des documents - Codage et contrôle de documents - Contrôles/Permissions d'accès - Conversion de fichier - Gestion de l'eau - Gestion de la conformité - Gestion de la durabilité - Gestion de la maintenance - Gestion de versions - Gestion des audits - Gestion des changements - Gestion des déchets - Gestion des flux de travail - Gestion des formulaires - Gestion des incidents - Gestion des inspections - Gestion des matières dangereuses - Gestion des plaintes - Gestion des réponses - Gestion des équipements - Logiciels d'actions préventives et correctives - Modèles personnalisables - Monitoring - Notation des risques - Outils de collaboration - Partage des fichiers - Planification d'audit - Planification de la réduction des émissions - Planification des gardes - Rapports d'incidents - Rapports personnalisables - Recherche/Filtre - Risk Analysis - Saisie de documents - Signature électronique - Stockage de documents - Suivi de la conformité - Suivi des gaz à effet de serre - Suivi des statuts - Suivi des émissions - Tableau de bord - Tableau de bord d'activités - Tenue des dossiers OSHA - Third-Party Integrations - Visualisation de données - Évaluation des risques ... et 12 fonctionnalités supplémentaires ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/courriel - Base de connaissances - Support téléphonique - Support 24/7 (réponse directe) - Chat/Clavardage ## Category - [Logiciels pour audit énergétique](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/20018/energy-management/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Logiciels pour audit énergétique](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/20018/energy-management/software) - [Logiciels de bilan carbone](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/30554/emissions-management/software) - [Solutions pour l'environnement](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/30662/environmental/software) - [Outils de gestion des risques](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/30665/risk-management/software) - [Logiciels QHSE](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/10015/ehs-management/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [Connecteam](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/153140/connecteam) — 4.6/5 (5203 reviews) 2. [MasterControl Quality Excellence](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/148577/mastercontrol) — 4.5/5 (534 reviews) 3. [SafetyCulture](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/141080/iauditor) — 4.6/5 (353 reviews) 4. [SiteDocs](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/143579/sitedocs) — 4.8/5 (255 reviews) 5. [Scrut Automation](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/1052809/scrut) — 4.9/5 (139 reviews) ## Avis ### "Finally, a system that delivers at a wonderfully affordable price" — 5.0/5 > **Ian** | *22 août 2021* | Aviation et industrie aéronautique | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: It truly delivers a range of services and features and a wonderfully affordable price. The implementation is simple; the features provide incredible flexibility to configure the system to deliver what I need. I cannot speak highly enough of the product and support. I have now implemented it in 4 different businesses because it is so flexible and cost-effective. > > **Inconvénients**: The system really has little not to like. The key is to think strategically to decide the data hierarchies to limit changes once the system is implemented. > > A simply outstanding product and so cost-effective for the functionality it provides. Not really surprising to see the list of companies it has been implemented in. ----- ### "Good value for money." — 5.0/5 > **Marcia** | *22 janvier 2025* | Administration publique | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Intuitive, simple to use and cost effective > > **Inconvénients**: There isn't much that I don't like, Though the risk management module is not intuitive and doesnt flow the way traditional static organisations would use it. It appears to be more focussed on a transitional environment such as construction or project based activities. Also I would suggest a review of the workflow for managing incidents could be better. > > I have nothing but good things to say about Ideagen Lucidity. From their Customer service, which is friendly and efficient, to the system itself. ----- ### "Functional Limitations, Poor Governance, and Administrative Inefficiencies" — 2.0/5 > **Utilisateur vérifié** | *23 avril 2026* | Construction | Taux de recommandation : 0.0/10 > > **Avantages**: The platform offers reasonable value for money compared to other products on the market. It is generally user-friendly for end users, with a relatively intuitive interface for day-to-day use. However, this ease of use does not extend to set-up and administration, which are more complex and less intuitive. From a governance perspective, document control is weak, and the overall structure of the platform appears poorly planned and organised. This creates challenges in maintaining consistency, traceability, and confidence in the integrity of records over time. > > **Inconvénients**: We predominantly rely on the InForm and Incident modules, as limitations in the other modules reduce their practicality and tend to complicate, rather than support, our processes. My experience with the InForm and Incident modules has been consistently frustrating. A key issue is the inability to properly preview forms that include conditional logic. Conditional fields do not display in preview mode, meaning administrators are forced to publish forms to validate them. This is not just inconvenient, it introduces real risk, as errors are only identified once the form is live. The suggested workaround of creating new versions to test changes is not practical in a controlled environment, as it disrupts internal reporting, impacts data continuity, and complicates the investigation of historical records. In addition, basic configuration tasks such as bulk editing fields, rearranging table columns, or converting field types require unnecessary rework, making the build process inefficient and time-consuming. The platform also falls short in terms of usability and flexibility when managing more complex forms. There is limited control over layout and structure, such as the inability to easily rearrange sections, minimise them, or apply conditional logic at a section level. Simple improvements, like consistent default radio button configurations or clearer visual distinction between sections, are missing. Administrative inefficiencies are further compounded by poor duplication behaviour, lack of formatting options, and rigid field settings. These issues collectively make it difficult to build structured, user-friendly forms at scale, and increase the likelihood of inconsistencies across projects. From a governance and systems perspective, the most significant concern is the lack of robust document control. There is no visibility over revision history, including who made changes, when they were made, or what was updated. There is also no ability to undo changes. This creates a major gap in traceability and accountability, particularly in environments where compliance and auditability are critical. Broader system issues, such as glitches between mobile and web submissions, poor integration between actions and parent records, limitations in role configuration, and inefficient file upload processes, further reduce confidence in the platform. While it may appear cost-effective at face value, the operational inefficiencies, compliance risks, and administrative burden significantly outweigh any initial savings. > > Not positive. They do not take feedback onboard or feature requests. They have no clear road-map of what is being worked on. In the past two years they have allocated time (and money) to introducing 2 new versions both of which were face-lifts only. ----- ### "Safety safety safety.. Incident reports made easy\!" — 5.0/5 > **Renee** | *13 décembre 2024* | Matériaux de construction | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: After utilizing this software multiple times while on-site today, I wanted to leave a review. Consumers tend to leave reviews when a product dissapoints them \& EHS has done nothing but impress me, the more that I utilize it\! The dashboard is what's truly sold me on this software\! It's updated in real time, so there's no waiting around for a list or an email to provide to our safety team about things that need addressed. Nobody has to run around trying to find someone or get the information relayed second hand. > > **Inconvénients**: I had to figure out how to re-size my photos because I sometimes get an error stating the file is too large. (When uploading to a report) Pictures of the injury or areas of concern such as a safety concern are important so luckily it was a simple fix to get my phone to take photos that aren't huge. > > Our business is one of the most dangerous ones in the industry. We make windows \& doors \& as you can imagine, that involves a lot of broken glass which can cause serious injuries. We've finally found the software that works across the board for everyone from the hourly worker to the project managers. EHS is faster, easier \& much more efficient for documenting incidents than the other software we've implemented in the past. They thought of all the important questions to ask in order to collect the critical details to reduce the risk of future accidents from occurring. This software utilizes an exact footprint of our building so employees are able to document exactly where the incident occurred. The best part of this software is that if someone recognizes something that could potentially be an issue in the future, they can simply report it in EHS, without the hassle of trying to track down someone from maintenance or the safety team . We are provided with immediate updates of what we call "hotspots," so they can be addressed right away. We have found that with this software, employees are recording a lot more non-injury incidents than they have in the past. The feedback we've received from our employees about switching to EHS has overall been positive. There's an option to report a non-injury incident, which was not available with our previous software. Our safety team wants every bit of information they can get in order to properly implement risk management \& this software makes that happen. Our company has already seen a decline in incidents by making the necessary changes to prevent them ahead of time. EHS hasn't missed a thing \& I don't imagine we'll be changing to a different program ever again. ----- ### "A great product for those who're looking for more than just compliance management" — 5.0/5 > **Theresa** | *2 mars 2023* | Conseil en gestion | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: We Initially used Lucidity Software to maintain our Integrated Management System, however, it's now become an integral part of our business. Whilst the system is modular, there are many core features that are common across all modules, meaning our people quickly became familiar with the look and feel of each module. We use the App for all our site work, and it's literally a game changer. > > **Inconvénients**: Not a criticism of Lucidity itself, but working in the construction industry, there are still occasions where we come up against the "what's wrong with a paper form" attitude. Now that Lucidity has introduced the App though, we're hearing this less and less. Inform really makes it so easy to complete site "paperwork" online. > > I've loved using Lucidity, both in my own company and with my clients. Compared to some of the older compliance management options out there, it really is a breath of fresh air. ----- Page : 1/4\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/150019/Ideagen-EHS?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/150019/Ideagen-EHS) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | ja | | ----- ## Données structurées