--- description: GraphDB : avantages et inconvénients. Lisez les avis clients, consultez les prix et découvrez les fonctionnalités. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: GraphDB - Avis, notes, prix et abonnements - Capterra Canada 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels de gestion de base de données](/directory/18/database-management/software) > [GraphDB](/software/157533/graph-db) # GraphDB Canonical: https://fr.capterra.ca/software/157533/graph-db Page : 1/2\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/157533/graph-db?page=2) > Référentiel sémantique et système de base de données NoSQL utilisés pour le stockage, l'interrogation et la gestion de données structurées et non structurées. > > Conclusion : 26 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.7/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise GraphDB? GraphDB est la base de données sémantiques orientée graphe préférée des entreprises de médias, des éditeurs, des musées, des secteurs de la science, de la santé et des recherches biotechnologiques, des assurances, des entreprises de renseignements sur les risques et de business intelligence ou encore des services marketing. ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.7/5** | 26 Avis | | Simplicité | 4.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos du vendeur - **Entreprise**: Ontotext - **Pays**: Sofia, Bulgarie - **Fondé**: 2008 ## Contexte commercial - **Type de licence**: (Version gratuite disponible) (Version d’essai gratuite) - **Public cible**: Travailleur autonome, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Mac (ordinateur), Windows (ordinateur), Linux (ordinateur), Windows (sur site), Linux (sur site) - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: Afghanistan, Afrique du Sud, Albanie, Algérie, Allemagne, Andorre, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua-et-Barbuda, Arabie saoudite, Argentine, Arménie, Aruba, Australie, Autriche, Azerbaïdjan, Bahamas, Bahreïn, Bangladesh, Barbade et 209 de plus ## Fonctionnalités - Base de données de graphiques - Gestion du stockage de données - Importation et exportation de données - Recherche/Filtre - Récupération de données - Réplication de données - Sauvegarde et récupération - Synchronisation de données ## Intégrations (1 au total) - MongoDB ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/courriel - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances - Support téléphonique - Chat/Clavardage ## Category - [Logiciels de gestion de base de données](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/18/database-management/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Logiciels de gestion de base de données](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/18/database-management/software) - [Logiciels de base de données NoSQL](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/32257/nosql-databases/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [Microsoft SQL Server](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/1417/sql-server) — 4.6/5 (1974 reviews) 2. [MySQL](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/11482/mysql) — 4.6/5 (2094 reviews) 3. [MongoDB](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/127374/mongodb) — 4.7/5 (468 reviews) 4. [Airtable](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/146652/airtable) — 4.6/5 (2222 reviews) 5. [Oracle Database](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/5938/oracle-database) — 4.6/5 (471 reviews) ## Avis ### "The best RDF graph database in the market" — 5.0/5 > **Stratos** | *6 décembre 2023* | Services d'information | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: - Compliance to all the W3C standards, including SHACL. - User-friendly UI. - Aesthetically superior visualizations. - Great documentation: As detailed as it needs to be, but not more than that. - Great technical support (even for the GraphDB Free version users) that responds almost immediately. > > **Inconvénients**: I honestly cannot think of anything negative to say about the tool and the customer support. Even though the company behind the tool (Ontotext) is a big global enterprise, every interaction I have with them feels like they genuinely care about whatever issues I am having with GraphDB and honestly want to help out in resolving it. > > I have been using GraphDB for several years now and in almost all the positions I have worked for. In my opinion, it is by far the best tool out there for managing RDF graph databases. I love the simplicity of the interface, the practicality and aesthetic superiority of the visualizations and the overal "smoothness" that comes with using it. I cannot stress enough how great the technical support has always been at responding blazingly fast and always providing solutions to various issues one may come accross, even if they are GraphDB Free users. ----- ### "Nearly instantaneous, rich-featured semantic repository" — 5.0/5 > **Mark** | *29 octobre 2019* | Recherche | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: It's very quick and easy to deploy GraphDB, ingest some RDF data, build queries in a IDE-like environment, and visualize relationships. A semantic similarity search tool is provided. > > **Inconvénients**: The OntoRefine tool is great for converting tabular data files into semantic triples, but there's no support for reading from relational databases. There are nice free text indexing \& search tools, but no natural language parser for discovering entities and relationships. There are several pre-configured reasoning levels plus support for writing one's own rules, but no support for SWRL. Like most triplesotres, OWL2 reasoning over complex axioms and millions of data triples isn't fun/fast/realistic? (I say that based on a single node, two threads, and 256 GB RAM.) > > There are other triple stores with different feature sets, but it don't think there's any triplestore that is better than GraphDB. ----- ### "review of graphdb in the production planning" — 4.0/5 > **Alexander** | *5 novembre 2019* | Recherche | Taux de recommandation : 6.0/10 > > **Avantages**: - ease of use (compared to other semantic web stack solutions) - degree of inferencing implementation - solution for transforming relational data into RDF with OpenRefine integration - query performance (for SELECT, a evaluation for INSERT queries could not be given due to use of free version) - good support even at free version > > **Inconvénients**: - versioning of data (see changes over time) - better controllability of role and rights (give rights for specific graphs in repository) - no IdP based authentiaction like OpenID Connect (or something based on oAuth2 or at least SAML) - easy to use integration for object storage (like AWS S3) - documentation could be more detailed in some places > > We are currently using graphdb in a PoC as semantic web stack compliant database for data integration in a laboratory environment. ----- ### "GraphDB" — 5.0/5 > **Joop** | *5 novembre 2019* | Administration publique | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: I can be very short about my (our) experiences so far with GraphDB. GraphDB is a clear winner for our usecases now. The learning curve is not steep, almost self-explanatory. It’s fast and it fits our needs; for now. We loved the graphics of GraphDB. > > **Inconvénients**: OntoRefine. It looks fine but we missed some modeling features. We switched back to OpenRefine. > > We use GraphDB together with PoolParty as part of the Semantic Integrator solution. We use GraphDB as our test triple store. We use GraphDB to publish our "small" linked open data sets. ----- ### "One of the best for graph databases" — 4.0/5 > **Utilisateur vérifié** | *3 octobre 2019* | Recherche | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Sparql support. Ease of setup. Webservice api. Functionality of free version. > > **Inconvénients**: Speed changes after some updates. Removal from GCC > > The use of graphDB solves many speed issues as it is very fast. The webservice api allows manipulation of the repositories (create, delete, import). The only problem is that after some updates, the speed of the endpoint queries dorps very much. An example for this if the migration from v8.11.1 to v9.0. I am using the free version but in a single thread and they mention that the only limitation of the free version is the limitation of simultaneous queries to only two. I had the same problems when i tried the enterprise edition for a trial period and never managed to reach the speed of the free version with any change I tried in the setup or options. ----- Page : 1/2\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/157533/graph-db?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/157533/graph-db) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Données structurées