--- description: BrowserStack : avantages et inconvénients. Lisez les avis clients, consultez les prix et découvrez les fonctionnalités. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: BrowserStack - Avis, notes, prix et abonnements - Capterra Canada 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Outils de test automatisé](/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) > [BrowserStack](/software/162900/browserstack) # BrowserStack Canonical: https://fr.capterra.ca/software/162900/browserstack Page : 1/32\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/162900/browserstack?page=2) > Plateforme de test multinavigateur conçue pour aider les développeurs à tester des applications mobiles et des sites web. > > Conclusion : 774 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.6/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise BrowserStack? En bref : toute personne qui conçoit et/ou développe pour le web ouvert. Ces outils de test interactifs multinavigateurs ne requièrent aucune compétence en codage. ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.6/5** | 774 Avis | | Simplicité | 4.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.4/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.2/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos du vendeur - **Entreprise**: BrowserStack - **Entreprise fondée en**: 2011 ## Contexte commercial - **À partir de**: 39,00 $ US - **Type de licence**: (Version gratuite disponible) (Version d’essai gratuite) - **Public cible**: Travailleur autonome, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Mac (ordinateur), Windows (ordinateur) - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: Afrique du Sud, Allemagne, Australie, Brésil, Canada, Danemark, Inde, Irlande, Israël, Mexique, Royaume-Uni, Singapour, Émirats arabes unis, États-Unis, îles Vierges américaines, îles Vierges britanniques ## Fonctionnalités - Alertes/Notifications - Annotations - Archivage et rétention - Assurance qualité - Automated Testing - Ciblage du public - Contrôles/Permissions d'accès - Détection d'anomalies - Enquêtes et feedback - Enregistrement et transcription vidéo - Gestion de projets - Gestion de versions - Gestion des audits - Gestion des documents - Gestion des exigences - Gestion des flux de travail - Gestion des incidents - Gestion des performances - Gestion des risques - Gestion des référentiels - Gestion des tests - Gestion des tests de logiciels - Identification des goulots d'étranglement - Indicateurs quantitatifs - Intégration continue - Mesure des performances - Monitoring - Monitoring réseau - Multiple Test Types - Outils de collaboration - Piste d'audit - Prise en charge de l'exécution parallèle - Rapports et analyses - Scripts de test - Scénarios de test de charge - Suivi de la conformité - Suivi des activités - Suivi des problèmes - Suivi des problèmes - Test de charge - Test des performances - Test mobile - Test web - Traçabilité - Visualisation de données - Vue hiérarchique - Vérification des scripts de test ## Intégrations (16 au total) - Appium - Bitbucket - CircleCI - Cypress - Espresso - GitHub - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Slack - Travis CI - Trello - Tricentis qTest - WordPress ... et 1 intégrations supplémentaires ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/courriel - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances - Support téléphonique - Chat/Clavardage ## Category - [Outils de test automatisé](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Outils de test automatisé](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) - [Logiciels de débogage](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/30090/bug-tracking/software) - [Logiciels de test utilisateur](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/32295/user-testing/software) - [Logiciels de test de charge](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/32135/load-testing/software) - [Logiciels de gestion des tests](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/34315/test-management-tools/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [QA Wolf](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/1012378/qa-wolf) — 5.0/5 (69 reviews) 2. [Lyssna](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/178766/usabilityhub) — 4.6/5 (87 reviews) 3. [TestRail](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/128204/testrail) — 4.3/5 (179 reviews) 4. [kapptivate](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/1069772/kapptivate) — 4.5/5 (6 reviews) 5. [Lightster](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/1063000/lightster) — 4.7/5 (9 reviews) ## Avis ### "Streamlining Cross-Browser and OS Testing with Ease" — 4.0/5 > **Deepti** | *7 avril 2026* | Logiciels | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: The tool offers a wide range of device and browser options to choose from, which makes cross-platform testing highly effective. I especially appreciate the ability to test on browser versions up to N-2, as this is a key requirement for our project and supports our compatibility needs. Additionally, the tool enables seamless testing on macOS with the latest and multiple OS versions, eliminating the need for a physical Mac machine. This flexibility has been extremely valuable for our testing efforts. > > **Inconvénients**: The tool’s built-in accessibility features are not included in the basic license, requiring users to upgrade to a premium plan to access them. Additionally, it does not provide the ability to test on older browser versions on real devices, which can be a limitation for backward compatibility testing. > > Overall, my experience with BrowserStack has been very positive. The platform provides a broad range of devices, browsers, and operating systems, making cross-browser and cross-platform testing efficient and reliable. The ability to test against browser versions up to N-2 is especially valuable, as this aligns well with our project requirements. I also found the macOS testing support particularly helpful, as it allows testing across multiple macOS versions without the need for a physical Mac machine. That said, there are a few limitations to note. Built-in accessibility testing features are only available with a premium license, which can be a constraint for teams using the basic plan. Additionally, the inability to switch to older browser versions on real devices limits backward compatibility testing in some cases. Despite these drawbacks, BrowserStack remains a robust and dependable tool that significantly enhances our overall testing capabilities. ----- ### "User-Friendly Platform, Yet Customer Support Needs Improvement" — 4.0/5 > **Arthi** | *24 mars 2026* | Comptabilité | Taux de recommandation : 7.0/10 > > **Avantages**: The UI of BrowserStack is clean, intuitive, and easy to navigate. Most of the frequently used features—like device selection, browser choices, and test session controls—are clearly visible and well‑organized. The overall usability is smooth, and switching back and forth between devices or test sessions feels seamless. The platform offers straightforward access to essential tools such as logs, screenshots, and videos, making debugging much faster. Overall, the interface supports a very user‑friendly testing experience with minimal learning curve. > > **Inconvénients**: The response I received from \[sensitive content hidden\] came across as quite rude. It gave me the impression that BrowserStack may not be fully prepared to assist customers who have doubts or questions. If new customers are addressed in this manner, it raises concerns about the level of support provided to existing customers as well. > > Overall, my experience has been positive so far. I’m still getting familiar with the application, but the learning curve has been manageable. It would be beneficial to have more integrations with other tools and platforms, as this would further enhance usability and workflow efficiency. ----- ### "BrowserStack: A Secure and Efficient Solution for Cross-Browser Testing and Semi-Automation" — 5.0/5 > **Abilash** | *11 septembre 2025* | Services financiers | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: It's super easy to use and lets you test websites across tons of devices without needing to own them all. The speed and real-time accuracy are impressive. > > **Inconvénients**: Sometimes the virtual devices can be a bit slow to load, and a few older browsers lag or crash. Also, the pricing can feel high for smaller teams or individual users. > > My overall experience with BrowserStack has been very positive. It offers a secure and reliable platform for cross-browser testing, which is essential for delivering high-quality web applications. The value for money is solid, especially considering the wide range of devices and browsers available for testing. I also appreciate its strong integration with test management and automation tools, which has helped streamline our QA process and improve overall efficiency. ----- ### "Good But Fix Billing Sync Issues" — 4.0/5 > **Daniel** | *23 mars 2026* | Hôpitaux et soins de santé | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: I really like that when a failure happens, we're able to see a playback video of everything that happened up to the point of the failure. That kind of visual context makes us confident of the reproduction steps. > > **Inconvénients**: We have had some issues with billing. There have been automated messages that we receive which sound like we are going to have our services cutoff despite our payment being in transit. I wish that paying would be more straight forward so that we wouldn't feel like we are panicking everytime we want to renew. > > Overall, it has been good. It is a reliable service (other than the scary automated billing messaged I mentioned above). ----- ### "“Great Tool for Real Device and Browser Testing" — 5.0/5 > **Neha** | *28 mars 2026* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: I liked most about BrowserStack is its real device testing capability, which allows you to test applications on actual browsers and devices without maintaining your own infrastructure. It’s fast to set up, highly reliable, and integrates smoothly with automation tools like Selenium, making testing more efficient and scalable. > > **Inconvénients**: I liked least about BrowserStack is that it can sometimes experience performance lag or slow loading, especially during peak usage or when running multiple sessions. Additionally, the pricing can be quite high for smaller teams or individual users. > > My overall experience with BrowserStack has been very positive. It provides a reliable and efficient way to perform cross-browser and real device testing without the need for maintaining physical infrastructure. The platform is easy to use, integrates well with automation tools, and helps speed up the testing process. While there are occasional performance lags and the pricing can be a bit high, the overall functionality and convenience make it a valuable tool for ensuring application quality. ----- Page : 1/32\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/162900/browserstack?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/162900/browserstack) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Données structurées