--- description: OpenText Application Quality Management : avantages et inconvénients. Lisez les avis clients, consultez les prix et découvrez les fonctionnalités. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: OpenText Application Quality Management - Avis, notes, prix et abonnements - Capterra Canada 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Outils ALM (Application Lifecycle Management)](/directory/30525/application-lifecycle-management/software) > [OpenText Application Quality Management](/software/174868/alm-quality-center) # OpenText Application Quality Management Canonical: https://fr.capterra.ca/software/174868/alm-quality-center Page : 1/2\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/174868/alm-quality-center?page=2) > Plateforme logicielle unifiée permettant d'accélérer la fourniture d'applications sécurisées, fiables et modernes. > > Conclusion : 23 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.4/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.4/5** | 23 Avis | | Simplicité | 4.4/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 3.9/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.0/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 80% | (8/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos du vendeur - **Entreprise**: OpenText - **Fondé**: 2004 ## Contexte commercial - **Public cible**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Windows (ordinateur), Windows (sur site), Linux (sur site) - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: Canada, Royaume-Uni, États-Unis ## Fonctionnalités - Contrôle de qualité - Gestion de la conformité - Gestion de versions - Gestion des changements - Gestion des exigences - Outils de collaboration - Vérification des scripts de test ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/courriel - Support téléphonique ## Category - [Outils ALM (Application Lifecycle Management)](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/30525/application-lifecycle-management/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Outils ALM (Application Lifecycle Management)](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/30525/application-lifecycle-management/software) - [Logiciels de gestion de la qualité](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/30099/quality-management/software) - [Outils de test automatisé](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [Odoo](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/135618/odoo) — 4.2/5 (1294 reviews) 2. [QT9 QMS](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/97557/qt9-quality-management) — 4.8/5 (117 reviews) 3. [Autodesk Forma](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/218046/autodesk-construction-cloud) — 4.3/5 (2204 reviews) 4. [VLX](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/1036434/visualogyx) — 4.9/5 (16 reviews) 5. [IntellaQuest](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/129973/intellaquest) — 4.1/5 (8 reviews) ## Avis ### "Most used Project management tool in IT industry" — 4.0/5 > **Charan Raj** | *8 mars 2022* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: In ALM , I like features and integration with other softwares like HP UFT, Tosca and Loadrunner softwares Easy to track project tasks Backlogs Log defects Can schedule to run automation scripts > > **Inconvénients**: It's little expensive compared to other tools > > I strongly recommend for Large scale projects It is very useful for time management, tasks , tracking, reporting everything is good ----- ### "Test Management tool ALM" — 5.0/5 > **Nitin** | *16 février 2020* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: 1. One solution for all Test Management (Test planning, execution and defect management) 2. Fast and reliable 3. Support end to end traceability 4. Integration with UFT automation tool. 5. Support upload using existing Excel test cases 6. Access management for various type of users 7. Web based tool 8. API available for automation > > **Inconvénients**: 1. Sometime it failed to download components while opening in browser due to access level issue 2. Unfortunately, no support to major automation tool selenium 3. Can’t export attachments with test cases 4. High cost per user 5. If ALM is closed and if you reopen the same test it shows object locked 6. No support to update defect from excel. Except automation API > > I am using ALM from more than 10 years , have seen many enhancements. I love this tool for test Management and highly recommend to other if you can manage the cost. It’s an easy web based tool for requirements management, test planning, execution and defect reporting. ----- ### "ALM doesn't have the bang for the buck." — 3.0/5 > **Judith** | *29 juin 2022* | Logiciels | Taux de recommandation : 2.0/10 > > **Avantages**: This software is great for tracking requirements and tests. It also tracks issues found, and when they are corrected. However, the reporting is clunky and not easy to work with. > > **Inconvénients**: Higher level review to give management insite into the project. ----- ### "Best software life cycle management tool, worth to use" — 5.0/5 > **Senthilkumar** | *27 décembre 2019* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Below are salient features that makes life easy for any software professional -Traceability matrix, end to end traceability, integration with other market tools like JIRA, REST API to develop excel macro utilities, UFT integration, cross project customization, defect management process, Business excel addin to load the entities, risk based planning and execution, Corporate LDAP user management based on single sign on options, business process testing, Auto-pass license server configuration > > **Inconvénients**: Apart from high license cost, I see all the features are beneficial. Pointing a one feature that still not comfortable is version management - check out / check in entity. > > Holding large number of business users who use software systems to track their deliverables which is really challenging one. We designed and create folder structures in ALM modules and customized different workflow models to accommodate the business process, automation and performance testing. Synchronized company users along with ALM LDAP mechanism. Satisfying all business roles like business analysts, developers, Quality assurance and performance teams along with this single tool. Upgrading new version comes with new features and easy to upgrade the data without spending additional cost on application and database servers. ----- ### "Quality center is still going strong" — 5.0/5 > **Per** | *18 février 2022* | Produits pharmaceutiques | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: -All features other ALM tool manufacturers claim is actually working better in QC -Simplicity of using , you know where you are what you filter how you find thing through traces -More advanced testplanning than all other tool (maybe except codebeamer) - Easy adminstration - easy to search and present during audits. - remarkable possibilities with risk management IF some people just let their confusing ideas start from 0 again > > **Inconvénients**: Interface on Explorer Not entirely web based Feelgood appearance (Looks old) > > Implemented it in 3 major organization, easy to learn is my major experience. An introduction to new users just take 20 min and then they are fully self going. Worked some other systems where filter seems to be very complicated to implement in an easy way, non filters as good as QC. Compared to JAMA .... ----- Page : 1/2\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/174868/alm-quality-center?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/174868/alm-quality-center) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Données structurées