--- description: Shelby Arena : avantages et inconvénients. Lisez les avis clients, consultez les prix et découvrez les fonctionnalités. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Shelby Arena - Avis, notes, prix et abonnements - Capterra Canada 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels de gestion d'églises](/directory/20046/church-management/software) > [Shelby Arena](/software/175655/arena) # Shelby Arena Canonical: https://fr.capterra.ca/software/175655/arena Page : 1/3\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/175655/arena?page=2) > Shelby Arena est un vaste système de gestion d'églises avec une compatibilité totale grâce aux logiciels de comptabilité, de membres et de dons Shelby. > > Conclusion : 38 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.0/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise Shelby Arena? Pour les églises qui souhaitent une solution de gestion d'églises personnalisée et ont du personnel dédié pour gérer cette solution robuste. ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.0/5** | 38 Avis | | Simplicité | 3.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.1/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 3.8/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 3.8/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 70% | (7/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos du vendeur - **Entreprise**: Ministry Brands - **Fondé**: 2005 ## Contexte commercial - **À partir de**: 449,00 $ US - **Public cible**: 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Windows (ordinateur) - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: États-Unis ## Fonctionnalités - Calendrier en ligne - Communication avec les membres - Don en ligne - Gestion des abonnements - Gestion des bénévoles - Gestion des dons - Gestion des petits groupes - Gestion des promesses de don - Gestion des événements - Intégration comptable - Répertoire de membres - Suivi des présences ## Ressources d'aide - Chat/Clavardage ## Category - [Logiciels de gestion d'églises](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/20046/church-management/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [ChurchTrac](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/125787/churchtrac) — 4.8/5 (859 reviews) 2. [Planning Center](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/76708/planning-center) — 4.7/5 (1137 reviews) 3. [Clearstream](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/158103/clearstream) — 4.8/5 (656 reviews) 4. [Tithely Church Management](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/132513/breeze-chms) — 4.8/5 (623 reviews) 5. [Chmeetings](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/184192/chmeetings) — 4.9/5 (154 reviews) ## Avis ### "Excellent database" — 5.0/5 > **Vicki** | *16 août 2019* | Gestion d'organisme à but non lucratif | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Customizable Comprehensive Moderately easy to learn to use and teach. > > **Inconvénients**: must have a developer to make many design changes. > > Overall I have had a great experience with Arena and would highly recommend it. The more we use it, the more we learn, the more we can do with it. ----- ### "A long history of stability and scalability" — 4.0/5 > **Christopher** | *11 novembre 2020* | Institutions religieuses | Taux de recommandation : 3.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Arena allowed us to track congregants and have them sign up for events and more easily track and record donations. It gave us a single place to store congregant data, and to provide our congregation with a single username and password for everything our church did online. > > **Inconvénients**: It was not as easily customizable as we would like, and many of the issues we had couldn't be resolved by support. It felt like the features it came with out of the box determined what we could do. We ultimately switched away from it after a few years of use. > > Overall we were able to get many things accomplished with our ministry to kick start a new era of tracking and managing congregant data, and were able to directly import check donations including scanned copies. We were also able to provide online event registration for the first time. Despite our issues with it, I still am glad we chose it over many of the other systems we were also evaluating at the time. ----- ### "Way behind the times" — 2.0/5 > **Utilisateur vérifié** | *1 novembre 2018* | Institutions religieuses | Taux de recommandation : 0.0/10 > > **Avantages**: If you're using arena, it's probably because you used Shelby - they'll port your info from your old Shelby account making it easier to move from one system to the other. It is web based and it generally functions as a decent database. > > **Inconvénients**: If Shelby classic was stuck in the 1990s Arena is stuck in the early 2000's - Shelby is at least ten years behind with everything they do. The small groups search function isn't really useful and doesn't look good when integrated into a well-designed website. All the interfaces are archaic and difficult to use. It isn't intuitive or forward thinking in its interface. It seems stuck in the 80s and 90s when it comes to its way of thinking. It has no worship planning component, no event planning component, no options for creating calendars that are accessible or visible to the public. (though if it did have those features I have no doubt they would be difficult to use and unattractive.) Anyone who is knowledgeable about modern church management software will hate everything Shelby produces. > > The people at Shelby are nice people, they just aren't up with the times. If they could get ahead and make things easier to use and more attractive or just add simple things like making their group search feature customization so it could be integrated into your existing website's design - and making everything platform agnostic so it would easier to use on tablets and phones, then they'd be halfway there. They're just so far behind and still not catching up that I would really recommend against putting your church management needs in their hands, because if you do you'll be stuck there. ----- ### "Shelby Next Membership Review" — 4.0/5 > **Sandi** | *7 février 2020* | Institutions religieuses | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Ease of use for both admin and membership. > > **Inconvénients**: Transition from previous software was a little rocky. Took too long. > > Great customer service\! Prompt and knowledgeable. It has streamlined our processes for tracking membership and visitors. ----- ### "Arena allows our large staff to work together and mutually benefit each other in productivity." — 5.0/5 > **Cara** | *22 mai 2018* | Institutions religieuses | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: It is flexible and allows us to categorize things according to our needs. Maintaining records can be effectively done by a number of people, which in turn benefits the whole organization and makes communication and other work efficient. Maintaining family relationships is easy and clear. Each ministry can have its section but work is done similarly so cross training is easy. Security is specific and granular so it is easy manage the access people have. It is easy to see how people are involved and connect with them according to their interests. The Members Responsive Portal allows congregation participants to manage their personal information, register for events and connect to volunteer positions. All of that updates their records and their record shows their own activity. God's work in this world is supported and furthered because our staff works with a common purpose. The data work is done once, in one place and all are blessed by up-to-date shared information. Development is strong > > **Inconvénients**: The best part of Arena is also its hardest part - its ability to be customized. Each instance of Arena is unique. It takes a lot of work to move in and get ministries set to work efficiently. It takes a strong lead person to have a vision that gets the whole staff working together and moving in the same direction. Ministries are often used to working in isolation from each other. If they don't learn how to standardize the way they work so the whole organization works the same way, everyone fails. Following direction of the trainers is paramount\! Incorrect set up of check in, group structure, etc. causes huge headaches and wastes time. Without a well developed strategy for setting up Arena it doesn't work. Strong guidance is needed for efficient set up. Communicating with PARENTS (or split households) of students who are connected to groups or tags is not effective. Custom procedures are needed to do this easily. > > Working with a common purpose as a whole staff. After getting all of the ministries working with a common goal and unified processes work became more efficient and understandable to staff members. It truly helps us work to support God's work in our world. ----- Page : 1/3\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/175655/arena?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/175655/arena) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Données structurées