--- description: CardBoard : avantages et inconvénients. Lisez les avis clients, consultez les prix et découvrez les fonctionnalités. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: CardBoard - Avis, notes, prix et abonnements - Capterra Canada 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels de gestion des produits](/directory/30865/product-management/software) > [CardBoard](/software/176690/cardboard) # CardBoard Canonical: https://fr.capterra.ca/software/176690/cardboard Page : 1/8\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/176690/cardboard?page=2) > CardBoard aide les équipes à explorer et à visualiser en collaboration les idées de produits, les expériences utilisateur, les voyages des clients et plus encore. > > Conclusion : 170 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.2/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise CardBoard? Clients de grande entreprise Travailleurs à distance Développeurs de logiciels Clients individuels ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.2/5** | 170 Avis | | Simplicité | 4.3/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.4/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.0/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 3.9/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 80% | (8/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos du vendeur - **Entreprise**: CardBoard - **Pays**: Carmel, É.-U. - **Fondé**: 2016 ## Contexte commercial - **À partir de**: 10,00 $ US - **Type de licence**: (Version gratuite disponible) (Version d’essai gratuite) - **Public cible**: Travailleur autonome, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Mac (ordinateur), Windows (ordinateur) - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: Australie, Canada, Inde, Japon, États-Unis ## Fonctionnalités - Accès mobile - Alertes/Notifications - Clavardage et messagerie - Définition des priorités - Fonction de glisser-déposer - Gestion de contenu - Gestion des backlogs - Gestion des exigences - Gestion des flux de travail - Gestion des idées - Gestion des tâches - Importation et exportation de données - Modèles personnalisables - Notes et commentaires - Outils de collaboration - Planification de lancement - Planification de projets - Profils de clients - Rapports et statistiques - Roadmap stratégique - Roadmap stratégique de produits - Sprint planning - Suivi de la progression - Suivi de la progression des tâches ## Intégrations (3 au total) - Confluence - Jira - Pivotal Tracker ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/courriel - FAQ/forums - Support téléphonique - Chat/Clavardage ## Category - [Logiciels de gestion des produits](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/30865/product-management/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Logiciels de gestion des produits](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/30865/product-management/software) - [Logiciels de parcours client](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/31537/customer-journey-mapping-tools/software) - [Outils Kanban](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/31580/kanban-tools/software) - [Outils Scrum](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/31581/scrum/software) - [Plateformes collaboratives](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/15/collaboration/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [Aha\!](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/144020/aha) — 4.7/5 (561 reviews) 2. [monday.com](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/147657/monday-com) — 4.6/5 (5730 reviews) 3. [Jira](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15322 reviews) 4. [Trello](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/1010321/trello) — 4.5/5 (23493 reviews) 5. [ClickUp](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/158833/clickup) — 4.6/5 (4565 reviews) ## Avis ### "CardBoard" — 4.0/5 > **Peter** | *27 juillet 2018* | Services financiers | Taux de recommandation : 7.0/10 > > **Avantages**: The simplicity of the tool, it provided me with what I wanted and did not over complicate it with features I did not need. > > **Inconvénients**: The export to excel option was pretty messy, but then again why export it? What I wanted was a way to capture the full board visually to put into a document or communication, to show the overall Story Map (which I could not get in screen shots) I realize I could provide a link to the board for people to access and see the actual Map, but sometimes you just want a picture of it to support a communication. > > I stumbled upon CardBoard a long time ago (2011) when I wanted an easy way to capture a Story Map. I really liked how easy it was to drop cards, move them around, and add some comments. The Team really enjoyed the look and feel of it. It did what we wanted and nothing more. I'm not a heavy user of it, but when I do need to put together a Story Map, CardBoard is what I turn to. ----- ### "Cardboardit for developing roadmaps and communicating with stakeholders" — 4.0/5 > **Sean** | *27 juillet 2018* | Vente au détail | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: The application is intuitive and it's very easy to demonstrate the importance of technical debt to stakeholders. > > **Inconvénients**: The export capability is limited. The description of the cards can not be exported without printing each card individually. The board view PDF export is not as user friendly/aesthetically pleasing as the actual application. Stakeholders are asking for PDF exports, however, I hesitate to share due to the aforementioned reasons. > > The tool is great for presenting the roadmap to leadership, stakeholders, and Engineers. I would highly recommend it, however, would also suggest getting enough licences for all folks on your team due to the limited export capabilities. ----- ### "A great product if it's the only thing you were using." — 3.0/5 > **Utilisateur vérifié** | *27 juillet 2018* | Logiciels | Taux de recommandation : 6.0/10 > > **Avantages**: I liked that it was very easy to use. Almost everything was very click and drag, which made it really easy to onboard new users who were new to story mapping. I also really appreciated that it let me share a story map across multiple locations. I work with teams in SF and Seattle. A physical board is a nice idea but just not possible with the way that we are distributed. > > **Inconvénients**: I had some challenges with user management. I work in a large enterprise so adding users individually was a bit of a pain and it was challenge to move users from regular viewer to user or admin roles on multiple boards. I also found that bulk moves of cards was difficult. If I wanted to pick up several cards and put them between two existing rows that wasn't really possible without spending 8 or 10 minutes rearranging the other cards around it to keep the map coherent. Also our org runs on-prem JIRA and I had no way to connect JIRA and confluence together, which made it nearly impossible to keep the two in sync. This is ultimately why I stopped using the product. > > I was attempting to bootstrap some existing teams so that they could start doing more end to end thinking about their products as we were designing and building them. ----- ### "Good but with some hiccups" — 4.0/5 > **Mark** | *27 juillet 2018* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 7.0/10 > > **Avantages**: I quite liked the intuitive interface and ease of storyboarding things. > > **Inconvénients**: The JIRA integration left something to be desired. The software did not do a good job of informing me of what it would do when I synced the two. It was also not clear to me that this was not a constant sync. Changes in one product were not automatically migrated over to the other. This was especially problematic because later syncs of the stories and epics caused duplicates of the previously synchronized items to appear because the system did not identify previously sync'd stories. > > I found the software quite useful for basic storyboarding and brainstorming new projects. Unfortunately, due to the limitations of the JIRA integration and the nature of the work I'm doing, it just wasn't useful for anything other than large/complicated projects that need a fair amount of planning and it could only be used in the initial stages. Once I had the list of story "slugs" it was better to manually migrate the list over to JIRA and cease using Cardboard. ----- ### "The easy way to Story Mapping" — 5.0/5 > **Veselin** | *2 août 2018* | Logiciels | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: While working with paper and stickies is the most quick tool to adopt, sometimes a digital one is required, as it provides certain benefits (quick editing; sharing; remote collaboration). I liked that it required zero learning for the basics. I just did the storymaps without a hitch, no wondering how I can do this or that. Of course, it provides some advanced functionality, but for the pure, basic, stickies-on-the-wall, experience, you there isn't a learning curve. Just plug and do. > > **Inconvénients**: The free version is said to work like the GitHub model - all boards are public. Everyone can see them and browse them. So far so good. However, unlike GitHub where you can use one of several ways to get your repository to other people (sharing a link, inviting them, telling them the name of the repo...) I didn't find any of it here. I could not share the free board to my colleagues (even for viewing). There is a workaround with exporting, which can get the job done. I understand this is their business model, but then the site should not describe it working as GitHub's public repos, as it, in practice, differs as an end result. > > It's a useful tool which gets the job done. You sign up, and create a board without even thinking about the functions. It's that easy. Especially after they updated the interface. Keep in mind the tool is more in the freeform category - you can place anything anywhere in a grid - it won't require you to put specific things in specific slots. The drawback of it is that while it is comfortable, it can't fully integrate with task/issue tracking tools. ----- Page : 1/8\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/176690/cardboard?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/176690/cardboard) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Données structurées