--- description: ValueOps : avantages et inconvénients. Lisez les avis clients, consultez les prix et découvrez les fonctionnalités. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: ValueOps - Avis, notes, prix et abonnements - Capterra Canada 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels de communication d'équipe](/directory/31033/team-communication/software) > [ValueOps](/software/177580/ca-flowdock) # ValueOps Canonical: https://fr.capterra.ca/software/177580/ca-flowdock Page : 1/2\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/177580/ca-flowdock?page=2) > Outil de communication qui met en relation les coéquipiers par le biais d'un chat à distance, qui peut être défini en fonction des sujets, des lieux et des fuseaux horaires. > > Conclusion : 24 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.0/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise ValueOps? Pour les équipes de toutes tailles. ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.0/5** | 24 Avis | | Simplicité | 4.0/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 3.9/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 3.9/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 3.8/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 70% | (7/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos du vendeur - **Entreprise**: Broadcom - **Fondé**: 1986 ## Contexte commercial - **À partir de**: 3,00 $ US - **Type de licence**: (Version gratuite disponible) (Version d’essai gratuite) - **Public cible**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Mac (ordinateur), Windows (ordinateur), Linux (ordinateur) - **Langues**: anglais, chinois, japonais - **Pays disponibles**: États-Unis ## Fonctionnalités - @mentions - Clavardage et messagerie - Conférences vidéo - Discussions/Forums - Gestion de contenu - Outils de collaboration - Recherche/Filtre - Tableau de bord d'activités ## Intégrations (34 au total) - Airbrake - AppSignal - Asana - Assembla - Basecamp - Beanstalk - Bitbucket - BugSnag - CircleCI - Confluence - Datadog - GitHub - Highrise - Jira - Librato ... et 19 intégrations supplémentaires ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/courriel - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances - Chat/Clavardage ## Category - [Logiciels de communication d'équipe](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/31033/team-communication/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Logiciels de communication d'équipe](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/31033/team-communication/software) - [Plateformes collaboratives](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/15/collaboration/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [Slack](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/135003/slack) — 4.7/5 (24046 reviews) 2. [Connecteam](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/153140/connecteam) — 4.6/5 (5058 reviews) 3. [Microsoft Teams](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/168668/microsoft-teams) — 4.5/5 (10940 reviews) 4. [WhatsApp](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/180345/whatsapp) — 4.7/5 (16296 reviews) 5. [Telegram](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/180347/telegram) — 4.7/5 (6406 reviews) ## Avis ### "next level chat tool" — 5.0/5 > **Art** | *13 février 2021* | Vente au détail | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: I like the way how Flowdock connects the team chats with external alerts that can be setup easily in the app. > > **Inconvénients**: it doesn't look as friendly as in slack, but again - way better than teams ;-) also the mobile app is slow sometimes. > > we use to have internal team chats + extra alerting from 3rd party services. ----- ### "The best Slack alternative out there" — 5.0/5 > **Utilisateur vérifié** | *3 décembre 2022* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Flows were invented in this app basicallyVery lightweight design, nothing distractingQuite fast > > **Inconvénients**: Native mobile apps always had some sort of delay with notificationsNative mobile apps weren't as good designed as desktop ----- ### "The Diet Soda of Communication Apps" — 3.0/5 > **Utilisateur vérifié** | *8 novembre 2018* | Production audiovisuelle | Taux de recommandation : 5.0/10 > > **Avantages**: I like the ability to sync the software with Amazon S3 to keep an archive of all conversations/files. The desktop/browser version of the product is useful and dependable. > > **Inconvénients**: The mobile app experience is really quite painful. > > It's a fine option for certain companies I'm sure. I mean when mandated it's a useful communication platform where people can get work done and build relationships. I just have had a horrible mobile experience. From receiving notifications about new messages that when I go to read causes the app to freeze and crash, to being told while in the app there's a new app update and then not finding a new mobile update in my mobile app store. It's frustrating how the browser platform works well enough for me to want to consider the mobile app version, but then the mobile version makes me want to leave the software completely. ----- ### "Good IM but needs a little more to compete with other IM alternatives" — 4.0/5 > **Utilisateur vérifié** | *29 janvier 2019* | Logiciels | Taux de recommandation : 7.0/10 > > **Avantages**: The threading system in flowdock is very intuitive, the thread replies are not hidden within the general chat, but instead they are color coded, so you can quickly identify what/who you are replying to, and at the same time, your reply is visible to everyone in the chat, not only to the people in the thread, which promotes communication between every contact in the chat. There is also an option to add hashtags to the messages, that is very useful when you have to search for specific things in the chat history. > > **Inconvénients**: A lot of functionality in flowdock comes in the form of an integration, you have to add plugins in order to do other things, like screen sharing, that could be already in the tool, like its competitors do. > > Very good IM option, user friendly, promotes communication, just needs to include more functionality out of the box. ----- ### "Nice way to collaborate" — 4.0/5 > **Utilisateur vérifié** | *3 décembre 2019* | Logiciels | Taux de recommandation : 7.0/10 > > **Avantages**: It is pretty nice in terms of threading conversations and keeping multiple conversations separate so people can read an entire conversation together. > > **Inconvénients**: When someone screws up and doesn’t people thread they are the only one who can fix it, but only if they do it right away. > > Overall pretty good at what it does. Allows conversations to happen where the whole team can see and interact with them. ----- Page : 1/2\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/177580/ca-flowdock?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/177580/ca-flowdock) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | ----- ## Données structurées