--- description: UsableNet AQA : avantages et inconvénients. Lisez les avis clients, consultez les prix et découvrez les fonctionnalités. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: UsableNet AQA - Avis, notes, prix et abonnements - Capterra Canada 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels de conformité](/directory/30110/compliance/software) > [UsableNet AQA](/software/181065/usablenet-aqa) # UsableNet AQA Canonical: https://fr.capterra.ca/software/181065/usablenet-aqa Page : 1/2\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/181065/usablenet-aqa?page=2) > Une plateforme cloud d'accessibilité du contenu web que toute votre équipe peut utiliser pour effectuer des tests, des corrections et des activités de suivi. > > Conclusion : 22 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.5/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise UsableNet AQA? Toutes les entreprises peuvent utiliser AQA pour gérer des tâches et effectuer des audits, des tests d'accessibilité et le suivi des normes ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act). Les équipes qui utilisent AQA comprennent les équipes de développement, les équipes de contenu, les équipes d'assurance qualité et les équipes de produits. ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.5/5** | 22 Avis | | Simplicité | 4.1/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.4/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.3/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 80% | (8/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos du vendeur - **Entreprise**: Usablenet ## Contexte commercial - **À partir de**: 200,00 $ US - **Type de licence**: (Version gratuite disponible) - **Public cible**: 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Windows (sur site), Linux (sur site) - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: Canada, Italie, Royaume-Uni, États-Unis ## Fonctionnalités - Analyse de contenu - Gestion des audits - Gestion des flux de travail - Outils de collaboration - Rapports et analyses - Real-Time Monitoring - Suivi de la conformité - Third-Party Integrations - Visualisation de données - Vérification des scripts de test - Website Accessibility Tools ## Intégrations (2 au total) - Jenkins - Jira ## Ressources d'aide - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances - Chat/Clavardage ## Category - [Logiciels de conformité](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/30110/compliance/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Logiciels de conformité](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/30110/compliance/software) - [Outils de test automatisé](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) - [Logiciels de monitoring website](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/10021/website-monitoring/software) - [Logiciels d'accessibilité des sites web](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/33135/website-accessibility/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [Accessible Web RAMP](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/213613/accessible-web-console) — 4.6/5 (18 reviews) 2. [Level Access Platform](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/204051/level-access-platform) — 4.5/5 (12 reviews) 3. [accessiBe](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/212877/accessibe) — 4.6/5 (53 reviews) 4. [BrowserStack](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/162900/browserstack) — 4.6/5 (749 reviews) 5. [Datadog](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/135453/datadog-cloud-monitoring) — 4.6/5 (357 reviews) ## Avis ### "Great tool for our team" — 4.0/5 > **Debra** | *21 mars 2022* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 7.0/10 > > **Avantages**: We were able to deploy an internal instance to test products on our internal servers. We can also use the browser extension for quick tests. > > **Inconvénients**: We had some issues deploying the internal instance - but the team is very responsive and helpful. > > Still ramping up - but I am excited to use this tool to automate processes and bring all teams into compliance using a single tool to report and manage accessibility. ----- ### "Great value for money" — 5.0/5 > **Heather** | *9 mars 2022* | Loisirs, voyage et tourisme | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: AQA allows us to carry out accessibility audits of our web platforms pretty painlessly. I love how it steps you through the manual checks and also shows you visually exactly where errors appear on the page. Having the 'auto only' options is great too. The reporting options are excellent, particularly the one for stakeholders showing an overall accessibility score and a summary of issues, and the one for dev teams with links into the tool for every issue. It's also really helpful to see the issues shown on a complexity/severity chart – super useful. > > **Inconvénients**: There are some elements we feel could be improved, which the team at UsableNet are always interested in hearing about and will work on improvements if they can. It would also be great if we could run our own tests on native apps, but I know this is a little more tricky\! > > Working with UsableNet, we're now able to measure and track the accessibility of our web products, and for the first time ever, report an accessibility score on our Engineering Scorecard, alongside other important metrics like performance and security. The UsableNet team are also great to work with, always responding to queries quickly and in a very helpful way. ----- ### "CW/DL AQA REview" — 3.0/5 > **Rich** | *15 mars 2022* | Vente au détail | Taux de recommandation : 6.0/10 > > **Avantages**: It is potentially critical to our organization becoming ADA compliant and avoiding any lawsuits > > **Inconvénients**: It is not the most user-friendly - the explanation of certain things which are reported is not always clear and sometimes can be downright confusing and frustrating. Additional clarity on certain elements would go a long way towards improving users' satisfaction with the software. ----- ### "AQA is the bees knees" — 5.0/5 > **Utilisateur vérifié** | *15 mars 2022* | Comptabilité | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: AQA is an easy-to-learn tool that allows for quicker auditing, manual testing, and defect creation. It integrates with JIRA easily and now has the ability to test emails and documents. Using AQA has saved a considerable amount of time compared to documenting defects on a spreadsheet and creating defects manually. It has been a game-changer for the projects I have worked on. > > **Inconvénients**: Integrating with some platforms who don't use traditional code can be tricky. The team has been great about finding work-arounds. The downfall is we have needed the AQA tech team to customize the platform for us in order to adequately test the platform our client is using. > > I've used AQA on several projects and the team has been incredibly responsive to requests and feedback. They improve the tool regularly and take users' feedback to heart. Compared to other similar platforms they are reasonably priced and provide many in-depth reporting options for stakeholders through development teams. Highly recommend. ----- ### "Good software for helping improve website accessibility" — 4.0/5 > **Anastasiia** | *22 mars 2022* | Logiciels | Taux de recommandation : 5.0/10 > > **Avantages**: - Very clear difference between automatic issues and issues that can be manually determined to be fixed or not. - Liked the rating of issues from easy to hard fix and their priority/impact. - Having sessions with the AQA team was valuable when we had questions/concerns. The team is very nice and helpful, they try their best to give personalized advice, however, beware that a lot depends on the quality of your website's code and your resources to fix it. - I loved the report exporting feature and that I was able to download the spreadsheet with all issues on all pages that were tested. I used the spreadsheet way more than the access to projects/tests via AQA itself. Spreadsheets are more intuitive. > > **Inconvénients**: - There has been a lot of confusion between "tests" and "audits" for our team. We still do not see much difference between the two and do not understand why there has to be both when they do look identical and offer identical information upon the analysis. In audits, it's even harder to find access to the issues Review page. I also don't understand why I can run a new test but cannot run a new audit. There are no quick tooltips or anything like that to explain the feature. - I think there has to be a lot of work done across the platform in terms of wording. I spent a lot of time understanding how to download an excel spreadsheet with the test results. It says "run the report" (or something of this sort). Why not say "download the report" instead? It's more straightforward. - There is no way to leave a comment on the platform to the commenter from the AQA team directly. I used Jira to communicate with the AQA team and ask questions there, which does take additional time of yours, however, I like how I could share screenshots and format text there for more clarity. - There's a chat feature that my team never used. I think unless there's a possibility to chat with AQA's team via this chat, it is not really helpful. - In this exact review survey, they are asking to rate some of the features I've never even seen or heard of. I tried googling them and no results. It's hard to understand what they are talking about if there's no consistency in wording across all touchpoints > > Overall, good product but some improvements should be done. I like that it helped us greatly to improve accessibility on our site and the team is helpful when questions arise. ----- Page : 1/2\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/181065/usablenet-aqa?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/181065/usablenet-aqa) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | ----- ## Données structurées