--- description: EDGE : avantages et inconvénients. Lisez les avis clients, consultez les prix et découvrez les fonctionnalités. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: EDGE - Avis, notes, prix et abonnements - Capterra Canada 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels de gestion d'essais cliniques](/directory/10035/clinical-trial-management/software) > [EDGE](/software/183126/edge) # EDGE Canonical: https://fr.capterra.ca/software/183126/edge Page : 1/3\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/183126/edge?page=2) > Système innovant de gestion d'essais cliniques basé sur le cloud, offrant une vue en temps réel de l'activité des recherches cliniques. > > Conclusion : 45 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.9/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise EDGE? Professionnels travaillant dans le secteur de la santé et de la recherche à travers le monde. ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.9/5** | 45 Avis | | Simplicité | 4.9/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 5.0/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.9/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 100% | (10/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos du vendeur - **Entreprise**: CIRU, University of Southampton - **Pays**: Southampton, R.-U. - **Entreprise fondée en**: 2000 ## Contexte commercial - **À partir de**: 1 000,00 £ - **Type de licence**: (Version d’essai gratuite) - **Public cible**: Travailleur autonome, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: Afrique du Sud, Australie, Belgique, Canada, Espagne, Inde, Irlande, Italie, Luxembourg, Nouvelle-Zélande, Pays-Bas, Portugal, Royaume-Uni, Suisse, Suède, États-Unis ## Fonctionnalités - Conforme HIPAA - Conformité 21 CFR Part 11 - Contrôles/Permissions d'accès - Facturation - Gestion des documents - Gestion des dossiers patients - Gestion des flux de travail - Gestion des patients - Gestion des rendez-vous - Gestion des stocks - Gestion financière - Gouvernance de l'information - Importation et exportation de données - Planification - Planification des rendez-vous - Recrutement de patients - Saisie et transfert de données - Suivi des patients ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/courriel - Base de connaissances - Support téléphonique ## Category - [Logiciels de gestion d'essais cliniques](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/10035/clinical-trial-management/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Logiciels de gestion d'essais cliniques](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/10035/clinical-trial-management/software) - [Logiciels de gestion pour hôpital](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/30096/hospital-management/software) - [Logiciels de gestion des patients](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/30780/patient-management/software) - [Logiciels de gestion des données](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/31003/data-management/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [Florence eBinders](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/200364/florence-ebinders) — 4.5/5 (83 reviews) 2. [Castor EDC](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/143532/castor-edc) — 4.7/5 (204 reviews) 3. [ShareCRF](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/1031214/sharecrf) — 4.8/5 (45 reviews) 4. [ResearchManager](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/192454/research-manager) — 4.2/5 (118 reviews) 5. [Health Cloud](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/172299/health-cloud) — 4.4/5 (71 reviews) ## Avis ### "Portfolio and Informatics Manager" — 5.0/5 > **Rebecca** | *17 septembre 2026* | Recherche | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: What I like most about EDGE is that it provides an integrated way to track the full clinical trial process, from early pre-trial and feasibility activities through study activation, ongoing trial operations, recruitment monitoring, finance-related tracking, and trial completion. This process tracking is one of EDGE’s most valuable and unique features because it helps streamline work across the clinical trial lifecycle instead of treating each stage as a separate activity. EDGE is also well suited for use by a clinical trial network, region, or group of organizations that need a shared platform for working with the same trials and projects. As a web-based clinical trial management system, it allows member sites to maintain trial information directly in one platform while enabling network-level users to work with aggregate data for monitoring, reporting, and planning. This common platform supports both local operational workflows and broader strategic decision-making. Another important advantage is flexibility. Sites can enter data manually or use import tools, which helps accommodate different local workflows, resource levels, and stages of readiness. EDGE can also support individual study coordinators in tracking documentation, study status, and operational details, while also supporting national or regional reporting needs. This flexibility makes it useful across different levels of clinical trial operations. For national reporting, EDGE is particularly helpful because it can support collection of trial and recruitment information without requiring sensitive patient data. This is valuable when the goal is to monitor portfolio activity, recruitment trends, and operational progress while keeping reporting practical and proportionate. EDGE is also strong for reporting and operational oversight. Core fields and customized fields are reportable, which makes it possible to move away from static Excel-based reports toward more real-time, maintainable reporting processes. Its reporting functionality and API capabilities have become increasingly valuable, allowing us to connect EDGE data with dashboards and other tools to better understand, monitor, and communicate clinical trial activity across Canada. > > **Inconvénients**: The main challenge with EDGE is that it takes time to understand the different levels of data, configuration options, and reporting possibilities. To get the most value from the system, organizations need to invest time in developing best practices and deciding how data should be entered and maintained. Another limitation is that EDGE works best when users agree on standardized definitions and consistent workflows. Without clear guidance and shared expectations, sites or teams may use the system differently, which can affect reporting quality and comparability. For multi-site or network-level use, standardization, training, and governance are important to ensure the data remain meaningful and useful. > > I have used EDGE for more than 15 years, across both site-level and network-level contexts, and have had the opportunity to work with many of its features. From my experience, EDGE is a strong and practical clinical trial management system, especially for academic, regional, or national clinical trial environments where a shared platform is needed. Overall, I consider EDGE to be a worthwhile investment. It is easy to use once good processes are in place, and its value increases significantly when organizations use it consistently and connect it to reporting, dashboarding, and portfolio management processes. For 3CTN Coordination, EDGE has supported both operational management and higher-level analysis, making it an important part of our clinical trial informatics infrastructure. ----- ### "More pros than cons" — 5.0/5 > **Adina** | *16 septembre 2026* | Hôpitaux et soins de santé | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Versatility of forms and workflow and customization. Set up can be monitored as well as pending tasks > > **Inconvénients**: Not being able to have multiple studies under one umbrella study but rather having to set up separately ----- ### "EDGE - Easy to use, does what it says on the tin" — 5.0/5 > **Claire** | *10 mars 2025* | Santé, bien-être et fitness | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Easy to use, easy to navigate around interface, tabs do what you think they will, icons are sensible, system does not respond in unexpected ways. Operations are 'foolproof' - it is almost impossible to accidentally delete or overwrite something, which makes you confident to experiment. Support materials are easily accessible and clear, support team are great and really helpful. System can be optimised to have additional 'personalised' functions via Forms and Workflows so can be easily adapted to your own ways of working. > > **Inconvénients**: System logs you out if no keystrokes/mouse movements after a very short period of time (however this is required by security rules in NHS so not much they can do about this) > > Great system - easy to use, easy to train others to use, now currently could not do my job without it. I am evangelical about EDGE - it's a great design\! ----- ### "Easy to access system with adaptable functionality" — 5.0/5 > **Alessia** | *27 mai 2020* | Recherche | Taux de recommandation : 7.0/10 > > **Avantages**: The system is user-friendly and can allow training to be rolled out with minimal support. There is functionality to use adapt the system within the limits of the programme to be bespoke for your organisation. Allows collaboration, and visibility of data to a wide audience and it is particularly useful to be able to gain access from a web-browser for home working. It has been essential for our switch to home-working during the COVID-19 pandemic. > > **Inconvénients**: Creating reports being limited to admin users is not very user friendly due to time constraints for the admin staff. We do not use EDGE for our reporting purposes for that reason, however the ability to create reports for staff to use does get around this slightly. > > EDGE is a good company who we have had positive interactions with. When escalation is required to EDGE they are quick to get back to you and offer support via regional contacts if required. It is a very effective research management system. ----- ### "Edge is No.1 for Research" — 5.0/5 > **Alice** | *7 mars 2025* | Hôpitaux et soins de santé | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: I use Edge constantly throughout my working day, it is easy to navigate around and keeps track of all the studies that I currently have in set up. I use the reports regularly to keep up to date with the tasks I need to complete each week. Uploading documents has now become so much easier with Edge 3 and there are constant updates to make our work each day easier > > **Inconvénients**: Edge logs you out of your account after not using it for 20 mins or so so constantly logging back in. > > Edge is user friendly for all users whether it is used for study set up like me or the logging of new participants to a study or a new researcher who needs to understand the process of submitting a new study. I enjoy training new staff on Edge and showing other members of the team features that we currently do not use within our Trust. If I had it my way we would be using Edge to its full advantage and Edge would be the first port of call for everyone within the department. ----- Page : 1/3\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/183126/edge?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/183126/edge) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Données structurées