--- description: Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite : avantages et inconvénients. Lisez les avis clients, consultez les prix et découvrez les fonctionnalités. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite - Avis, notes, prix et abonnements - Capterra Canada 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels de saisie électronique de données](/directory/30551/electronic-data-capture/software) > [Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite](/software/192454/research-manager) # Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite Canonical: https://fr.capterra.ca/software/192454/research-manager Page : 1/6\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/192454/research-manager?page=2) > ResearchManager intègre efficacement la gestion des données (EDC, ePRO, RTSM, eConsent) et les opérations cliniques (CTMS, eTMF, LIMS, RIMS). > > Conclusion : 118 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.2/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite? Une diversité d'entités variée, comprenant plus de 100 000 acteurs tels que CROs, Pharma, Biotech, MedTech, établissements académiques, prestataires de soins de santé, et comités d'éthique médicale/institutionnels (IRBs). ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.2/5** | 118 Avis | | Simplicité | 4.0/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.0/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.1/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.0/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 80% | (8/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos du vendeur - **Entreprise**: Cloud9-Software - **Pays**: Deventer, Pays-Bas - **Entreprise fondée en**: 2013 ## Contexte commercial - **Prix**: Pour obtenir un devis personnalisé, veuillez visiter : https://my-researchmanager.com/en/pricing/. - **Public cible**: Travailleur autonome, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web - **Langues**: allemand, anglais, néerlandais - **Pays disponibles**: Afghanistan, Albanie, Algérie, Allemagne, Andorre, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua-et-Barbuda, Arabie saoudite, Argentine, Arménie, Aruba, Australie, Autriche, Azerbaïdjan, Bahamas, Bahreïn, Bangladesh, Barbade, Belgique et 204 de plus ## Fonctionnalités - Classification des documents - Conception des essais - Conforme HIPAA - Conformité 21 CFR Part 11 - Dossier médical informatisé et partagé - Gestion de la conformité - Gestion des documents - Gestion des flux de travail - Gestion des formulaires - Gestion des patients - Gestion des stocks - Gestion financière - Imagerie de documents - Importation et exportation de données - Piste d'audit - Planification - Rapports et analyses - Recrutement de patients - Saisie de données à distance - Saisie décentralisée - Saisie électronique des données - Scan et analyse d'image - Suivi des patients - Third-Party Integrations ## Intégrations (10 au total) - AFAS Software - Clue - ExactSpent - Fitbit - Freestyle Solutions - Polar - Samsung SDS - Wahoo Trace - Whoop - Zwift ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/courriel - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances - Support téléphonique - Support 24/7 (réponse directe) - Chat/Clavardage ## Category - [Logiciels de saisie électronique de données](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/30551/electronic-data-capture/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Logiciels de saisie électronique de données](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/30551/electronic-data-capture/software) - [Logiciels de gestion d'essais cliniques](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/10035/clinical-trial-management/software) - [Logiciels de saisie de données](https://fr.capterra.ca/directory/30543/data-entry/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [Florence eBinders](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/200364/florence-ebinders) — 4.5/5 (83 reviews) 2. [ShareCRF](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/1031214/sharecrf) — 4.8/5 (44 reviews) 3. [Health Cloud](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/172299/health-cloud) — 4.5/5 (44 reviews) 4. [Castor EDC](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/143532/castor-edc) — 4.7/5 (204 reviews) 5. [Flex Databases platform](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/124010/flex-databases-platform) — 4.5/5 (13 reviews) ## Avis ### "Excellent software" — 5.0/5 > **Utilisateur vérifié** | *2 septembre 2023* | Hôpitaux et soins de santé | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Can exchange data with other research teams, even those working on projects at different trial sites.Provides the ability for electronic signatures, making it simpler to get informed approval from study participants and record it. > > **Inconvénients**: Time consuming when transferring large data set from the application ----- ### "Descent EDC" — 4.0/5 > **Noudjoum** | *24 juin 2026* | Produits pharmaceutiques | Taux de recommandation : 6.0/10 > > **Avantages**: I liked the ease of use of it, the validation steps were easy and not too much complainte from the sites about data entry. The reporting is good. > > **Inconvénients**: The roles \! They are all prédéfined in the system and cannot be customized, the query management is not convenient, and the customer service is in Rurope which made it difficult for urgent matters. > > I run three studies on it and the three of them run smoothly. Data entry was easy, data validation was easy too. The lock and data extraction were also straight forward. ----- ### "User-friendly system with potential for improvement" — 3.0/5 > **Marta** | *25 juin 2026* | Hôpitaux et soins de santé | Taux de recommandation : 5.0/10 > > **Avantages**: What I liked most about ResearchManager is that, from a monitor’s perspective, the system is quite intuitive and easy to navigate. The layout is clear and logical, which makes it relatively easy to find the necessary information. > > **Inconvénients**: From a monitor’s perspective, the weakest point is that SDV can only be performed for closed visits, and only at the page level rather than for individual data points. In other systems, I have seen a more practical solution where each data point has a default status of “SDV not performed”, which can then be changed to “SDV performed” or “SDV not OK”. If “SDV performed” is selected and the site subsequently changes the entered data, the status automatically changes to “Data changed after SDV”. In my opinion, this functionality greatly facilitates monitoring and the tracking of all data changes. Another problematic aspect is the lack of possibility to raise queries in empty visits. In such cases, I have to contact the site separately by email and provide screenshots from the eCRF to indicate the missing data. It would also be very helpful if the query status were clearly visible, i.e. whether a query has already been addressed and closed or whether it still requires action. Currently, it is only visible that a query has been raised for a given parameter, but the actual status is not clear. In addition, in the query list, it would be very useful to see the specific queries linked to specific parameters, rather than only the sections in which the queries were raised. If there are many parameters and several queries, it is easy to overlook one of them. > > Overall, my experience has been positive. I find the system quite intuitive and easy to work with, but I think some improvements, especially in SDV and query management, could make it even better :) ----- ### "Easy of use in multicenter trials" — 5.0/5 > **Mikko** | *24 juin 2026* | Hôpitaux et soins de santé | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Everything in order and in the same place. Easy to access form anywhere and esay to learn how to use. Makes performing a trial a lot easier. > > **Inconvénients**: The automatic query, when missed filling a required field- would be nicer to remind that nort all required fields are filled yet, do you really want to "save as complete"? > > I use it regularly in a multicenter- trial as a head of corelab. Although all the parties involved are located in different countries, this no longer makes any difference. ----- ### "Efficient Clinical Research Management Platform with Strong Workflow Capabilities" — 4.0/5 > **Mateusz** | *11 juin 2026* | Recherche | Taux de recommandation : 6.0/10 > > **Avantages**: The platform helps centralize study management activities in one place, improving collaboration between research teams. I particularly appreciated the document management functionality, workflow support, and the ability to track study progress efficiently. The system promotes better organization and transparency across research projects. > > **Inconvénients**: The user interface can feel somewhat complex for first-time users, and some advanced functions are not immediately intuitive. Additional customization options for reports and dashboards would be beneficial. The initial setup and onboarding process may require dedicated training. > > Overall, my experience with Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite has been positive. The platform provides a comprehensive environment for managing research activities and helps streamline administrative and operational tasks. While there is a learning curve, the benefits in terms of organization, compliance support, and workflow efficiency outweigh the challenges. It is a valuable solution for research organizations seeking to improve study management processes. ----- Page : 1/6\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/192454/research-manager?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://fr.capterra.ca/software/192454/research-manager) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | da | | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## Données structurées