18 ans à aider les entreprises canadiennes
à choisir le meilleur logiciel
WebPT
Description de WebPT
Avec 30 % de part de marché, la plateforme de kinésithérapie leader WebPT permet d'améliorer les soins aux patients et de stimuler la croissance commerciale de manière optimale. Grâce aux fonctionnalités de planification, documentation, facturation, suivi des résultats, reporting commercial, outils d'engagement des patients et intégrations système, la robuste solution web de WebPT est idéale pour tout milieu ambulatoire, indépendamment de la taille du personnel, du type d'établissement ou du nombre de spécialités. WebPT fait preuve d'un taux de rétention de 99 % et de disponibilité de 99,99 %.
Qui utilise WebPT?
WebPT est employé par les cabinets de kinésithérapie, d'ergothérapie et d'orthophonie avec consultations ambulatoires aux États-Unis et au Canada. La plateforme prend actuellement en charge plus de 10 000 cliniques et 70 000 thérapeutes.
WebPT ne vous convainc pas tout à fait ?
Comparer avec une alternative populaire
WebPT
Alternatives à WebPT
Avis sur WebPT
Great cloud-based documentation system, but there are some bugs.
Avantages :
WebPT was easy to learn to use and easier to start actually documenting patient care on. Scheduling is helpful and being able to access the patient's chart through the schedule itself is great.
Inconvénients :
The schedule really needs to have a tracking feature, where you can tell what date/time the appointment was scheduled, checked in, etc; and there needs to be a rescheduling feature instead of just "cancel" or "delete". Also, there is a field where you can enter a Return to Dr. date, when the patient returns to see their referring provider, but the field resets itself randomly and does not keep the date in place. I have contacted customer service multiple times about this and their suggestions are not helpful and have not solved the problem.
Alternatives envisagées :
Meets All Your PT Needs
Commentaires : Over all it was a good experience. I would not be opposed to using it again.
Avantages :
Web PT made documentation needs easy and direct even for those new to charting. The templets available to craft notes and documentation requirements is better than other platforms used.
Inconvénients :
I did not like that the Thera bill feature was not all in one platform. Although the two are linked is not very convenient to use another web-based system to submit claims.
Great Program But Could Use Some Improvements!
Commentaires : It's a great first-time EMR system for companies who are smaller. WebPT was good at assisting you when you needed help and the onboarding was good too.
Avantages :
Generally, it is easy to use and was a good transition from having used no EMR prior to WebPT.
Inconvénients :
Lacks a lot of reports and the reports are not user friendly. No intake forms Billing is through a separate program Not very pediatric friendly
Ehhhh, could be better.
Commentaires : Overall, it got the job done. Not the most user friendly and am glad to have switched to new product.
Avantages :
I enjoyed that the patient's check in time was documented for easy reference.
Inconvénients :
Outdated interface. Poor placement of goals when writing daily notes.
WebPT is good BUT expensive!
Commentaires : Decent experience. Very functional but tedious with time consumption. There are a lot better options available with more inclusive features for less cost.
Avantages :
Easy to understand. Able to create evaluation and treatment templates so that you didn't have to write the same verbiage. Could carry over notes from the time before.
Inconvénients :
Expensive. Require multiple tabs open for the same patient because the SOAP note and the exercise flowsheet were not on the same page. It took 15-20 minutes to complete a note because of toggling between multiple tabs. Offered a lot of features for exercises and CRM but all extra features were a la carte. The expense for a solo practitioner and then to add users was too expensive. It would have been better to charge per number of visits per month vs. number of users. EMR and billing integration was not as synced as should have bee.
